Midori Castillo Meza vs Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Oct at 07:38 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Castillo Meza vs A. Carolina Nava Elkin

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

MEX
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Meza 1 - 0 Elkin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Midori Castillo Meza winning 2 and Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin winning 0. The last match between Midori Castillo Meza and Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin was at the W15 Santa Tecla, 07-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Midori Castillo Meza getting the victory 6-0 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Meza | 1 |
Elkin | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Santa Tecla(10-07-25)
M. C. Meza vs A. C. N. Elkin H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
50.00% (34-34) | Career Total W/L | 32.26% (40-84) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. C. Meza vs A. C. N. Elkin Match Preview:
- Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin has recently won 31.58% of points on her second serve, whereas Midori Castillo Meza has won 43.52%. How does this impact their performance on the court? Midori's stronger second serve gives her a clear edge.
- Recent return game stats show Amanda winning 51.57% of her opponent's second serve points, compared to Midori's 47.50%. Who performs better on first serve returns? Amanda has a slight advantage, winning 33.33% versus Midori's 32.60%.
- Under pressure, Amanda saves 38.60% of breakpoints, while Midori performs better at 49.38%. Is saving breakpoints crucial? Yes, it often swings momentum during crucial moments.
- Over the past year, Amanda has won 24.32% of her matches, while Midori has a higher win percentage at 61.90%. Who has shown more consistency overall? Clearly, Midori.
- Amanda excels on clay with a 39% win rate, but Midori's best is on hard courts, also at 39%. How do surface preferences affect the match outcome? It can be a significant factor, depending on the upcoming match surface.
- In terms of player level, Amanda competes mostly in Challengers/ITF, winning 26.09%, while Midori plays in Futures/ITF, winning 61.90%. Does playing in different event levels matter? Yes, it often indicates experience and skill against diverse opponents.
- Analyzing opponent quality, Amanda's opponents average a rank of 187.05, whereas Midori's are slightly higher at 182.24. Does playing higher-ranked opponents prepare a player better? Potentially, as it can sharpen competitive edges.
- Looking at decisive moments, Amanda has won 30% of deciding sets recently. Has Midori managed any victories in deciding sets? No, a potential weakness in tight matches.
Editorial Prediction (October 7, 2025, UTC):
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin and Midori Castillo Meza exhibit distinct strengths that might shape their upcoming match. Amanda's ability to win more points on her opponents' second serve could be crucial, particularly if Midori's second serve falters under pressure.
However, Midori's superior performance on her second serve and higher breakpoint saving percentage offer her a notable advantage in maintaining her serve games. Furthermore, Midori's overall match-winning consistency and experience against higher-ranked opponents suggest she may have the upper hand.
While Amanda has a slightly better track record in deciding sets, Midori's definitive edge in multiple key performance areas marks her as the likely winner for the forthcoming contest.
Midori Castillo Meza vs Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. C. Meza vs A. C. N. Elkin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 4 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
1:31:9 | Average Match Time | 1:31:9 |
75% (40/53) | 1st Serve % | 65% (32/49) |
68% (27/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 38% (12/32) |
46% (6/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (9/17) |
63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
57% (28/49) | Return Points Win % | 38% (20/53) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. C. Meza Recent Matches Played
A. C. N. Elkin Recent Matches Played

M. C. Meza vs A. C. N. Elkin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
50.00% (34/34) | YTD Win/Loss | 32.26% (40/84) |
48.97% (71/74) | Sets Win/Loss | 35.27% (97/178) |
49.46% (647/661) | Games Win/Loss | 43.00% (1032/1368) |
50.82% (31/30) | Hard Win/Loss | 26.67% (16/44) |
42.86% (3/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 38.71% (24/38) |
0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
5 | Aces Total | 114 |
0.07 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
42 | Total Double Faults | 430 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:4:44 |
299.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 306.04 |
66% (847/1283) | 1st Serve % | 59% (2982/5072) |
53% (447/847) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (1633/2982) |
46% (200/436) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (846/2090) |
56% (68/122) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (247/520) |
44% (537/1216) | Return Points Win % | 43% (2074/4880) |
44.44% (4/5) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (28/56) |
50.85% (30/29) | Futures W/L | 30.00% (12/28) |
48% (32/66) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 32% (40/124) |
57% (4/7) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (5/14) |
55% (6/11) | Deciding Set Win % | 37% (10/27) |
91% (33/30) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (46/36) |
9% (33/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (46/10) |
9% (35/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (78/4) |